The Squonk of Pennsylvania: The Weeping Fearsome Critter Explained
The Squonk is one of Pennsylvania's strangest folklore creatures: a miserable, constantly weeping animal said to haunt hemlock forests and, when frightened beyond escape, possibly dissolve into its own tears.
Today it is usually called a cryptid, an Appalachian monster, or simply the saddest creature in American folklore. But the surviving historical record points somewhere more specific. The earliest Squonk we could verify appears in William T. Cox's 1910 book Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods, a deadpan collection of impossible animals associated with North American lumber-camp storytelling.
That original Squonk is also different from the one repeated across modern websites. Cox never gave it a fixed size, color, piglike body, patchy fur, or salty tears. He did, however, name a supposed captor: J. P. Wentling, a man who turns out to have been a real professional forester.
This article follows the Squonk back to the original sources—separating what Cox actually wrote, what Henry H. Tryon added in 1939, and what later folklore and pop culture turned the creature into.
The Squonk at a Glance
- Best classification: Pennsylvania fearsome critter; later adopted into cryptid culture
- Earliest verified source: William T. Cox, Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods, 1910
- Original habitat: Pennsylvania's hemlock forests
- Only specific place named by Cox: Near Mont Alto, Franklin County, Pennsylvania
- Original appearance: Misfitting skin covered with warts and moles
- Behavior: Retiring, active around twilight and dusk, constantly weeping
- Famous defense: May dissolve itself into tears when cornered or frightened
- Mock scientific name: Lacrimacorpus dissolvens
- J. P. Wentling: A real forester used as the named figure in Cox's capture story
- Evidence: Strong documentary history as folklore; no physical evidence of an unknown animal
Jump to a Section
What Is a Squonk?
The Squonk is a legendary creature associated with the hemlock forests of Pennsylvania. Its defining feature is not strength, danger, or secrecy. It is misery.
In the earliest known printed description, the animal is shy and unhappy, with badly fitting skin covered in warts and moles. It travels mostly around twilight and dusk and cries so continually that a hunter can supposedly follow its tear-stained trail.
The strangest detail comes when the creature is trapped. Cox says that when escape appears impossible, or when the animal is surprised and frightened, it may dissolve itself in tears.
That combination—an impossible defense mechanism wrapped inside a pitiable personality—is why the Squonk stands apart from most other legendary American creatures. It is not a predator. It does not attack travelers. It does not destroy logging camps.
It is essentially a monster whose greatest enemy is being noticed.
Squonk Timeline: How the Legend Changed
The modern Squonk often looks like one continuous tradition. The documentary history instead breaks into distinct stages.
- Before 1910 — Possible oral tradition, but no verified Squonk record found Cox presents his creatures as products of lumber-camp storytelling, so an older oral Squonk is possible. Research for this article located no independent newspaper, book, folklore collection, or recorded oral account documenting the creature before 1910.
- 1910 — William T. Cox publishes the first recoverable Squonk Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods places the animal in Pennsylvania's hemlock forests and supplies the core traits: misfitting skin, warts and moles, constant weeping, the tear trail, possible dissolution, and the J. P. Wentling sack story.
- 1939 — Henry H. Tryon rewrites the creature Tryon's Fearsome Critters retains the unhappy Pennsylvania animal but adds a migration history, fossil remains, one-sided webbed feet, circular swimming, reflection avoidance, and greater awareness of its ugliness.
- 1957 — Jorge Luis Borges carries the Squonk into literary bestiaries Borges and Margarita Guerrero include the creature in Manual de zoología fantástica, helping move the obscure American lumberwoods animal into a much wider literary tradition.
- 1974 — Steely Dan references the Squonk's tears The creature appears briefly in "Any Major Dude Will Tell You," showing that the legend had entered popular music before the better-known Genesis adaptation.
- 1976 — Genesis releases "Squonk" Genesis turns the weeping creature and its disastrous capture into a full song on A Trick of the Tail, introducing the Squonk to a generation that had never encountered Cox's forestry book.
- Internet era — The Squonk becomes the "relatable sad cryptid" Artists, memes, merchandise, and cryptid communities increasingly portray it as a sympathetic mascot for anxiety, awkwardness, loneliness, and wanting to disappear.
- Modern Pennsylvania — The legend becomes civic folklore Events such as Johnstown's Squonkapalooza celebrate the creature as part of modern Pennsylvania and Appalachian cryptid culture.
The Earliest Written Squonk: William T. Cox, 1910
The earliest recoverable Squonk source located in the research for this article is William T. Cox's Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods, With a Few Desert and Mountain Beasts, published in Washington, D.C., in 1910.
Cox was not a cryptozoologist. He was a professional forester working for the U.S. Forest Service who would become Minnesota's first state forester the following year.
His book imitates the style of a natural-history field guide while cataloguing impossible animals associated with logging country. Cox's own introduction discusses creatures generated by logger imagination, stories strengthened through repetition, and tales used to entertain - or fool - people unfamiliar with the woods.
That context matters. Fearsome Creatures was not presenting zoological evidence for hidden species. It was preserving and performing the deadpan humor of lumber-camp storytelling.
Cox says the Squonk's range is limited and that the creature is fairly common in the hemlock forests of Pennsylvania. It travels around twilight and dusk, possesses misfitting skin covered with warts and moles, and is described as exceptionally morbid.
Most importantly, Cox gives us the elements that define the Squonk even today: constant weeping, a trail of tears, and the possibility that the creature can disappear by dissolving into its own sorrow.
What Did the Original Squonk Look Like?
This is where modern artwork has quietly become confused with historical description.
Cox gives surprisingly little anatomy. He does not specify the Squonk's size, weight, color, fur, nose shape, ears, eyes, tail, or overall body form. What he actually emphasizes is its skin and disposition.
How the Squonk's Appearance Changed
These are different stages of the legend—not one continuous original description.
Cox — 1910
- Misfitting skin
- Warts and moles
- Retiring disposition
- Twilight and dusk activity
- Constant tears
- No stated size
- No stated color
- No explicit piglike anatomy
Tryon — 1939
- Loose, warty, ill-fitting skin
- Explicitly extremely ugly
- Knows it is ugly
- Webbing only on its left feet
- Swims in circles
- Avoids seeing its reflection
- Expanded migration backstory
Modern Squonk
- Often small and piglike
- Drooping face and large eyes
- Sparse or patchy fur
- Brown, gray, pink, or pale skin
- Standardized quadruped body
- Depression-like personality
- Cute or sympathetic proportions
From the Lair of Mythics Cryptid Archives
Modern Squonk art has developed far beyond the limited anatomy given by Cox in 1910. Our Cryptid Archives version embraces the later melancholy Pennsylvania legend rather than presenting the artwork as a literal reconstruction of Cox's description.
Why Does the Squonk Cry?
Cox's answer is simpler than the modern psychological interpretation.
The Squonk is unhappy because of its misfitting, wart- and mole-covered skin. Cox calls it exceptionally morbid, but he does not give the animal a clinical diagnosis or build a deeper theory of shame, trauma, anxiety, loneliness, or isolation around it.
Tryon pushes the idea further in 1939 by making the creature explicitly aware of how ugly it is. His version also introduces the idea that the Squonk avoids seeing its reflection.
Modern culture takes another step. The Squonk is now frequently described as depressed, painfully self-conscious, socially anxious, or ashamed to be seen.
Those readings are understandable—and probably a major reason the creature remains popular—but they belong mostly to the afterlife of the legend.
Does the Squonk Really Dissolve Into Tears?
Yes—at least in Cox's story—but the original wording is more cautious than the version repeated online.
Cox says that when cornered and escape appears impossible, or when surprised and frightened, the creature may dissolve itself in tears.
That word matters. Modern summaries often turn the behavior into a guaranteed biological reflex: capture a Squonk and it instantly liquefies into a puddle. Cox presents it more like an absurd possibility within an already absurd natural-history parody.
The famous ending of the Wentling story is even more specific. After Wentling supposedly captures a Squonk in a sack, the load suddenly becomes lighter. When the sack is opened, only tears and bubbles remain.
There is no "salty water" in Cox. No acidic tears. No slime. No evaporation.
| Version | What Happens | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Cox, 1910 | The Squonk may dissolve itself in tears when escape is impossible or it is frightened. | Earliest verified literary version |
| Wentling story, 1910 | The captured creature disappears inside the sack, leaving tears and bubbles. | Part of Cox's tall-tale narrative |
| Tryon, 1939 | The dissolution ability is omitted. | Major later variant |
| Modern internet folklore | Often becomes instant melting into a complete puddle of salty water or tears. | Later simplification and embellishment |
J. P. Wentling Was Real—But Was His Squonk Encounter?
The Wentling story becomes much more interesting once the name is checked.
Cox identifies Mr. J. P. Wentling as a man formerly from Pennsylvania who was living at St. Anthony Park, Minnesota. According to the story, Wentling encountered a Squonk near Mont Alto, imitated its weeping, and persuaded it to hop into a sack.
University records show that a matching man really existed: John Philip Wentling, born in Pennsylvania in 1878, trained in forestry, employed by the Pennsylvania State Forest Academy, and later a member of the University of Minnesota forestry faculty.
His move to Minnesota also fits Cox's description.
That is unusually strong historical grounding for the name inside a fearsome-critter story—but it does not turn the impossible capture into a verified eyewitness report.
What Is a Fearsome Critter?
To understand the Squonk, it helps to put it back into the genre where it first appears.
Fearsome critters were impossible animals associated especially with North American lumber-camp folklore. Their stories were usually told with a straight face and mock seriousness, often to entertain workers, fool newcomers, explain strange events, or simply create something absurd enough to survive another telling.
The creatures could have impossible anatomy, bizarre habits, elaborate "scientific" names, or ridiculously specialized methods of attacking people and avoiding capture.
Cox's book includes creatures such as the Hidebehind, Splintercat, Agropelter, Hugag, and Gumberoo.
The Squonk fits the same deadpan world but is unusual in one important way. Most fearsome critters are dangerous, destructive, physically absurd, or built around some practical joke.
The Squonk is pathetic.
Its joke depends on pity rather than terror. That may be one reason it has survived better than many of its lumberwoods companions.
Was the Squonk Really an 1800s Lumberjack Legend?
Possibly—but that is not the same as saying we can prove it.
Modern summaries often state that the Squonk was part of Pennsylvania lumberjack folklore in the late nineteenth century. That timeline makes sense historically: the creature belongs to lumberwoods culture, and Cox says the strange animals in his book originated among loggers.
But searches for a pre-1910 Squonk in books, newspapers, forestry material, folklore collections, memoirs, and archival sources did not locate a verifiable earlier reference.
What remains possible: Cox may have been recording an older oral lumber-camp story that left no surviving written trail.
The careful wording is therefore "first documented in 1910" rather than "invented in 1910" or "known since the 1800s."
How Henry H. Tryon Changed the Squonk in 1939
Nearly three decades after Cox, forester Henry H. Tryon included the Squonk in his own collection, Fearsome Critters.
The creature still lives in Pennsylvania hemlock forests, cries constantly, and possesses loose, warty, ill-fitting skin. But Tryon gives it an elaborate new history.
His Squonk once supposedly inhabited high plains. Environmental change forced it toward swampy and lake-filled country, where it gradually developed webbing—but only on the feet on one side of its body. The result was disastrous: the Squonk could swim only in circles, and enormous numbers supposedly starved.
Tryon even invokes "fossil bones" as mock evidence.
He also makes the Squonk more psychologically self-aware. It knows it is ugly and dislikes seeing its reflection.
And then comes the surprise: Tryon leaves out the most famous part of the modern Squonk entirely.
There is no dissolving. No Wentling. No sack. No tears-and-bubbles ending.
| Trait | Cox 1910 | Tryon 1939 | Modern Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania hemlock forests | Yes | Yes | Usually retained |
| Misfitting / loose warty skin | Yes | Yes | Usually retained |
| Constant weeping | Yes | Yes | Core trait |
| Dissolves into tears | Yes, possibly | Omitted | Usually treated as essential |
| J. P. Wentling capture | Yes | Omitted | Frequently retold |
| Webbed left feet | No | Yes | Occasional trivia |
| Fear of its reflection | No | Yes | Often blended into "original" lore |
| Migration and fossils | No | Yes | Usually omitted |
The comparison shows why reading the early sources separately matters. The Squonk most people know today is not simply Cox's animal or Tryon's animal. It is a later composite assembled from both.
Where Did Lacrimacorpus dissolvens Come From?
The Squonk's pseudo-scientific name is not an internet invention and it was not created by Borges.
Lacrimacorpus dissolvens already appears with the creature in Cox's 1910 book. Cox credits U.S. Forest Service dendrologist George B. Sudworth with classifying the creatures in the collection, and Tryon's later version explicitly prints the abbreviation "Sudw." after the name.
The Latin-style construction combines words associated with tears, body, and dissolving. A natural English gloss would be something like "dissolving tear-body."
It sounds scientific because that is the joke. Cox's book repeatedly treats impossible lumberwoods creatures as though they belong in a legitimate zoological reference work.
Where in Pennsylvania Did the Squonk Live?
One of the most repeated descriptions of the Squonk is that it inhabits northern Pennsylvania.
That may describe the creature's later popular range, but it is not Cox's wording.
Cox says the animal is fairly common in the hemlock forests of Pennsylvania. The only specific Pennsylvania location in his entry is the Wentling experience near Mont Alto.
Mont Alto is in Franklin County in south-central Pennsylvania, near South Mountain—not in northern Pennsylvania and not in the Allegheny National Forest.
Squonk story geography. William T. Cox's 1910 account names a supposed encounter near Mont Alto in south-central Pennsylvania. Later retellings commonly place the Squonk farther north. Johnstown is shown for its modern Squonkapalooza connection. These are story-history locations, not verified animal sightings.
Mont Alto's presence is especially interesting because the location was an important center of Pennsylvania forestry. The Pennsylvania State Forest Academy operated there, and Wentling worked within that professional world before moving to Minnesota.
That makes Cox's choice of Wentling and Mont Alto look less like a random hunter story and more like a joke built around people and places his forestry audience could recognize.
The Squonk can reasonably appear in modern discussions of Appalachian cryptids, and it remains one of the defining creatures in Pennsylvania's wider tradition of cryptids and monster legends. Historically, though, "Pennsylvania fearsome critter" is the most precise label.
Are There Any Credible Squonk Sightings?
Not in the ordinary cryptozoological sense.
That is one of the biggest differences between the Squonk and creatures such as Bigfoot, Mothman, or lake monsters.
The foundational "witness," Wentling, was a real person—but the encounter appears inside Cox's humorous bestiary rather than in a diary, newspaper report, field notebook, scientific publication, or independent testimony.
Research for this article also examined later Squonk encounters repeated online. The supposedly historical cases frequently lead back to unsourced modern pages, faux case files, social-media anecdotes, or retellings that provide no original report.
That includes the anonymous Clinton County and Bald Eagle State Forest stories that appeared in an earlier version of this Lair of Mythics article. Those accounts have been removed because no primary source could be established for them.
That does not make the creature less useful to folklore research. In fact, it makes the Squonk unusually clean. We can watch a literary lumberwoods animal move into books, music, art, festivals, internet communities, and modern cryptid culture without pretending that every retelling represents a new biological encounter.
From Borges to Genesis: How the Squonk Became Famous
The Squonk might have remained a footnote in an obscure American forestry book if later writers and musicians had not carried it far beyond the lumberwoods.
Jorge Luis Borges and Margarita Guerrero included the creature in Manual de zoología fantástica in 1957. Borges did not invent the Squonk or its scientific-sounding name. His importance lies in transmission: an obscure Pennsylvania tall tale entered an international literary bestiary.
Steely Dan referenced the tears of the Squonk in 1974's "Any Major Dude Will Tell You." The reference predates the much better-known Genesis song and shows that the creature had already entered popular-culture vocabulary by the mid-1970s.
Genesis gave the Squonk its largest musical spotlight with the 1976 song "Squonk" on A Trick of the Tail. The song adapts the hunter-and-disappearing-creature structure and helped transform the Squonk from lumber-camp absurdity into something tragic and sympathetic.
Today the creature is drawn with enormous wet eyes, sagging cheeks, and expressions somewhere between embarrassment and despair. Memes portray it as socially awkward, overwhelmed, anxious, or simply unable to cope.
People joke about "feeling like a Squonk."
That version is far removed from a 1910 logging-camp bestiary—but it follows directly from the feature that always made this creature different. The Squonk was never frightening enough to become a great horror monster.
It was sad enough to become a mascot.
What Most Squonk Articles Get Wrong
The Squonk is a good example of how repeated folklore can gradually look more certain than the sources actually allow.
| Common Claim | Best-Supported Version | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| The Squonk dates to the late 1800s. | The earliest recoverable documentation located is Cox's 1910 book. Earlier oral circulation is possible but unverified. | Overstated |
| The Squonk originally lived in northern Pennsylvania. | Cox says Pennsylvania hemlock forests and names an encounter near Mont Alto in south-central Pennsylvania. | Later geographic tradition |
| It is piglike. | Cox does not specify a pig body, size, color, face, or fixed body form. | Modern artistic convention |
| Its tears are salty or acidic. | Cox mentions tears and bubbles, not salty water, acid, or slime. | Unsupported embellishment |
| It always dissolves when caught. | Cox says it may dissolve when cornered, surprised, or frightened. | Modern simplification |
| J. P. Wentling was a verified cryptid witness. | Wentling was a real forester, but the impossible capture is not independently corroborated. | Real person; literary anecdote |
| Webbed feet and reflection avoidance are original traits. | Those details appear in Tryon's 1939 version rather than Cox's 1910 description. | Misattributed |
| Lacrimacorpus dissolvens is a modern fake scientific name. | The name appears in Cox's 1910 book and is associated with George B. Sudworth's mock classifications. | Incorrect |
| The Squonk has a long history of eyewitness sightings. | No substantial independently documented sighting tradition was located. | Unsupported |
| The Squonk was always an "Appalachian cryptid." | It began in print as a Pennsylvania lumberwoods fearsome critter and entered modern cryptid/Appalachian culture later. | Anachronistic if applied to 1910 |
So, Is the Squonk Real?
There are two different questions hiding inside that one.
Is the Squonk a real piece of American folklore?
Absolutely.
We have a traceable 1910 source, an original illustration, a second major version from 1939, identifiable people behind the books, a real forester named J. P. Wentling, literary transmission through Borges, appearances in popular music, and a continuing cultural life in Pennsylvania.
Is there evidence that an unknown animal actually dissolves into tears in Pennsylvania forests?
No convincing evidence establishes that.
The creature's earliest known source belongs to a genre built around impossible logger animals, exaggerated anatomy, mock science, and practical-joke storytelling. There is no specimen, photograph, biological trace, stable eyewitness record, or plausible physiological mechanism for an animal turning its body into tears.
The simplest explanation is also the one most strongly supported by the historical record: the Squonk is a remarkably successful fearsome-critter tall tale.
But "tall tale" does not mean meaningless.
Some legendary animals endure because people remain afraid of them. The Squonk endured because later generations found something unexpectedly recognizable inside an absurd joke from the lumberwoods.
A creature embarrassed by its own appearance. A creature that hides. A creature that cries. A creature that would rather disappear than be cornered.
More than a century after Cox put it on the page, that turned out to be enough.
FAQ: The Squonk
What is a Squonk?
The Squonk is a Pennsylvania fearsome critter first documented in William T. Cox's 1910 Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods. It is described as an unhappy, constantly weeping creature that may dissolve into tears when frightened or cornered.
Why does the Squonk cry?
Cox links the Squonk's unhappiness to its misfitting skin, which is covered with warts and moles. Later versions make the creature more explicitly self-conscious about its ugliness.
What happens when a Squonk is caught?
In Cox's 1910 story, J. P. Wentling supposedly captures one in a sack. The load becomes lighter, and when he looks inside only tears and bubbles remain.
Does the Squonk really dissolve into tears?
Dissolving into tears is part of Cox's original literary description, but there is no biological evidence for such an ability. Interestingly, Henry H. Tryon's 1939 version omits the dissolution trait entirely.
Where does the Squonk live?
Cox says the Squonk inhabits the hemlock forests of Pennsylvania and places the Wentling story near Mont Alto in Franklin County. The familiar "northern Pennsylvania" range is a later tradition rather than Cox's wording.
Is the Squonk dangerous?
The early descriptions do not portray the Squonk as aggressive or predatory. It hides, cries, and attempts to escape. "Harmless" is a reasonable summary of the folklore.
Was J. P. Wentling a real person?
Yes. Historical university records identify John Philip Wentling as a Pennsylvania-born forester who later taught forestry at the University of Minnesota. That verifies the person, not the impossible Squonk capture story.
What does Lacrimacorpus dissolvens mean?
It is a mock-Latin scientific name roughly suggesting a "dissolving tear-body." It appears in Cox's 1910 book and was most likely supplied through George B. Sudworth's mock classifications.
Are there real Squonk sightings?
No substantial independently documented sighting tradition was located. The foundational Wentling story appears in Cox's humorous 1910 bestiary, while many later online encounters lack recoverable primary sources.
When was the Squonk first documented?
The earliest verified source located is William T. Cox's 1910 Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods. An older oral lumber-camp tradition is possible, but no independently verifiable pre-1910 Squonk source was found.
Is the Squonk real?
The Squonk is a well-documented folklore creature, but no physical evidence establishes the existence of an unknown animal matching its impossible traits.
Sources & Research Notes
This article prioritizes original and institutional sources and separates documented story history from later folklore and unsupported sighting claims.
- William T. Cox, Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods (1910). Full text. Earliest verified Squonk description.
- Coert Du Bois, original 1910 Squonk illustration. Wikimedia Commons.
- Henry H. Tryon, Fearsome Critters (1939). Squonk entry. Used to identify later additions to the legend.
- University of Minnesota School of Forestry, John P. Wentling memorial (1953). University archive.
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, William T. Cox biography.
- Pennsylvania DCNR, Mont Alto State Park history; Penn State Mont Alto, campus history.
- Pennsylvania Lumber Museum, Pennsylvania lumber history.
- Jorge Luis Borges & Margarita Guerrero, Manual de zoología fantástica (1957), used for later literary transmission.
- Pennsylvania county base map derived from U.S. Census Bureau mapping, Wikimedia Commons, CC0.
Research limitation: no verifiable pre-1910 Squonk source was located. That does not rule out an earlier oral lumber-camp tradition.
The Squonk began as a strange Pennsylvania creature in a 1910 lumberwoods bestiary. Tryon rewrote it. Borges carried it into literature. Musicians carried it into pop culture. The internet turned it into a mascot.
The story changed repeatedly, but one thing never did: the Squonk kept crying.
Explore the Cryptid Curiosities Collection and bring a legend home.
Explore More Cryptid Folklore
Return to: